Ban Section 19 c of the Race Relations Amendment Act 2000

Home | THe PETITION & UPDATES in the law.....

WHAT IS SECTION 19 C?

Section 19 c is a part of the Race Relations Amendment Act 2000 that states that Courts and Employment Tribunals are exempt & not subject to the conditions of the Race Relations Act.

Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 chapter 34.

under discrimination by public authorities,

Discrimination by public authorities.     19B. - (1) It is unlawful for a public authority in carrying out any functions of the authority to do any act which constitutes discrimination.
 
Exceptions or further exceptions from section 19B for judicial and legislative acts etc.     19C. - (1) Section 19B does not apply to-
 
 
    (a) any judicial act (whether done by a court, tribunal or other person); or
 
    (b) any act done on the instructions, or on behalf, of a person acting in a judicial capacity
JESUS HAS REDEEMED US FROM THE CURSE OF THE LAW BEING MADE ACURSE For uS FOR IT IS WRITTEN CuRSED is ANyONE THAT HANGS UPON A TREE. [Galatians 3v13] we are the head and not the tail above only and not beneath.

 

GO TO ONLINE PETITION: 10 DOWNING STREET PETITION(:BRITISH NATIONALS ONLY or THOSE LIVING IN BRITAIN)
 
OTHERS:

UPDATE UPDATE UPDATE
 
Following the ruling by HER LADY JUSTICE SMITH not to allow the appeal of my employment Tribunal case ( an increase in the award) my application to the European Human rights court was sent by fax earlier today.
 
Confirmation
Fax Sent To: 33388412730  
Recipient's Name: REGISTRAR  
Recipient's Company: EUROPEANCOURTOFHUMAN RIGHTS  
Client Code:  
Reference ID:  
Fax Quality: Fine  

Subject:
RE: OBISANYA V UNITED KINGDOM ( Section 19 C of the RACE RELATION AMENDMENT ACT 2000) – a violation of convention rights.
 
Cover Page:
Dear European COurt of Human Rights Please find attached my formal letter of complaint and application. The hard copies are in the post. Your sincerely, Elizabeth obisanya www.swordofthespirit.tv
 

letter.doc 31234 bytes Sent
IN EUROPEAN HUMAN RIGHTS COURT.doc 140290 bytes Sent
 
space

People shouting at the world over megaphones; Size=240 pixels wide

Arguements for KEEPING SECTION 19 c.
 
 1) The Exemption was put inplace to safeguard the Nation .
 2) To maintain the independence of the Judiciary.

ARGUMENTS AGAINST KEEPING THE SECTION.
 
1) RACE EQUALITY HAS COME OF AGE ( first RRA 1965:), THE SECTION UNDERMINES THE GOOD INTENTIONS OF THE WHOLE ACT.
2) THE SECTION IS NOT IN KEEPING WITH VARIOUS ARTICLES OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS  LAW 1948

NEW - the 10 dowing street petiton is not sending back confirmation emails to those on the petition... please let me know if this is still happeneing...
 
 
19th October 2007: The BAN SECTION 19C RRA 2000 under the name of AJUSTWEIGHT was approaved at 10 Downing Street online petition.
 
Click on link to sign.

 In AUGUST 2008 an application for a Judicial Review was made at the HIGH COURT to further amend the Race Relations Amendment Act.
 
The defendants were the Judges in the CASHBACK v CASHBACK case in their submissions they stated that they were not going to make any submissions as they were a court .[pleading SECTION 19 C geddit?]
 
The interested party - MInistry of Justice stated that they were not going to contest the claim..........
 
Liz
Sept 2008

LATEST UPDATE FROM EVENING STANDARD 7 th OCTOBER 2008.
 
 

~My JP colleagues' send .....TIM STEWART

AND DAI\lNY BRIERLEY

A LONDON magistrate has

accused court colleagues of being

racist and more likely to send

black people to jail. .

Iris Josiah, originally from

Antigua, said racism was common

on the bench and that some of her

fellow JPs at Enfield magistrates'

court tried to block her promotion.

Miss-Josiah, 50, said they were

also more likely to find black

defendants guilty, irrespective of

evidence, and refuse them bail.

She claimed she was often

ignored during deliberations on

the fate of black defendants.

Miss Josiah, an English teacher,

of Palmers Green, is seeking".

£75,000 in compensation for race

_ discrimination and victimisation,

which the Ministry of Justice

denies.

She became a JP at Enfield in

1995. After making a formal

complaint about racism in 1999,

she said court chiefs blocked her

career path. In legal papers

submitted to a Stratford

-- ---- - - -- .•~..-- -- -- ------- - ----- • -- -- --- O....,.•...•b..•. •..•..•..•...•..•J..•......••••

Racedaim:

English

teacher Iris

Josiah says

black

people are

harshly

, treated

ather

magistrates

court

about the alleged racism of one

female JP to her bosses. As a

result, she says she was banned

from sitting in the remand courts

because the alleged incident had

taken place in one of them.

She added; "Since this incident, I

have been subject to ongoing

unfair treatment, racism,

victimisation and harassment by

senior members of Enfield

magistrates' court."

Magistrates are eligible to

become court chairmen once they

have served for four years and

Miss Josiah first applied in 2000.

But she says that her promotionhas

been blocked while her white

counterparts-were given every

opportunity to progress.

She says that colleagues dragged

out the appraisal process she had

to undertake for six years to block

her. Miss Josiah has still not been

appointed a court chairman and

claims that other black

magistrates have been deliberately

overlooked too.

. She brought her tribunal claim

in February last year and her case

is due to be heard this year.

SENIORpolicemen have admitted that

some officers are guilty of "racist

stereotyping" and "unwitting prejudice"

in a document that will fuel the

debate about alleged racism in forces.

In a confidential briefing paper, the

Association of Chief Police Officers,

says that "ignorance of difference" and

"thoughtlessness" are further problems

which are blighting attitudes to the

ethnic minorities.

It also concedes that there are "cultural

barriers" within the police for '

non-white staff and that reforms are

needed to ensure that forces across the

country are "more tolerant" and value

difference.

The document, which is marked "not

to bepublished externally or to be given

out to the media", also emphasises that

progress is being made and that such

problems are isolated.

But the Met is already facing claims

of racist discrimination against its two

most senior Asian officers and calls by

the Black Police Association for potential

ethnic recruits to shun the force.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith last

night announced a nationwide review

of the treatment of ethnic minority

officers. And the country's only black

curno.

The' potentially lethal weapons are

often converted bycriminals to fire real .

bullets, and can be bought easily in

high-street shops and on websites.

The Met said it was investigating and

that police searched a nearby house

which the attacker was seen going into.

No one has been arrested. -

<~

MARTIN BENTHAM -

Home Affairs Editor

chief constable,MikeFuller of the Kent

force, a former senior Met officer, has

added to the controversy by claiming

in a Panorama documentary that ethnic

minority officers in London have to

work twice as hard to gain promotion.

The Association of Chief PoliceOfficers

document, which was sent out inad-

.vertently by email, was drawn up in

response to the programme and sets out

the "lines to take" when trying to deal

with the criticisms it contains,

It concedes that although recruitment

of ethnic minority officers has

improved Significantly, "retention and

progression" remains the "biggest challenge"

faced by forces and warns that

problems with "institutional racism"

and "police culture" remain.

"If the police service is considered

'institutionally racist' on the basis that

some of our processes: behaviour or

attitudes show signs of thoughtlessness,

ignorance of difference, racist

stereotyping or unwitting prejudice

then yes, there are signs that this still

is the case on some occasions," the

document states.

employment tribunal, she says: "I

witnessed the hostile treatment of

black defendants 'by some fellow

magistrates.

"It included harsh remarks,

severe sentencing, disregard for

personal mitigation and easy

findings of guilt, irrespective of

evidence. They were most likely to.

be refused bail and most likely to

be sentenced to prison."

Miss Josiah said she confronted

some of her colleagues over their

"unfair practices relating to black

defendants" and sidelining of her

during deliberations. In June 1999

she formally raised her concerns

=!-'- *

from Evening standard 7th oct 2008...